Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brian Alford v. Thomas Schweitzer, et al
as 23-3451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SCHWEITZER, Warden Madison Correctional Intitution, in his official and individual capacity, C. CANN, Unit Management Chief Madison Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity, Z. GOULD, Inspector, Madison Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity and others
Pierre-Z Lassetti, IV v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1305
Petitioner / Appellant:
PIERRE-Z RICARDO LASSETTI, IV
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Isaiah Smith v. Jeffrey Wood
as 17-1357
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISAIAH Z. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Wayne LaFountain v. Inger Meyer
as 16-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE EARL LAFOUNTAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
INGER Z. MEYER, Deputy Clerk, Michigan Supreme Court
Sandy Holt, Jr. v. Bonita Hoffner, et al
as 16-1303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY HOLT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BONITA J. HOFFNER, UNKNOWN PARTY, INGER Z. MEYER and others
Tonny Horne v. Z. McGarrity, et al
as 15-2103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONNY HORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
Z. MCGARRITY and DONNA BEAUVAIS
Tonny Horne v. Z. McGarrity, et al
as 15-1804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONNY HORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
Z. MCGARRITY and DONNA BEAUVAIS
John Lechner v. County of Marquette, et al
as 15-1648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS LECHNER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARQUETTE, Michigan, MARQUETTE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, GERALD O. CORKIN, Chairman and others
David Brown v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 13-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, NANNETTE NORWOOD, D.W., ERICA HUSS, D.W. and others
James Reece v. David Mills, et al
as 13-5366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MILLS, Warden, HENRY STEWARD, CERRICK SCHOFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
