Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 24-1636
Defendant:
CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Correctional Officer John Doe, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW CRANE, aka Timothy Andrew Lee Crane
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 24-1625
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Correctional Officer John Doe, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW CRANE, aka Timothy Andrew Lee Crane
Dammean Moss v. Andrew Dyer, et al
as 24-1514
Defendant:
WENDI WALWORTH, BECKY CARL, KATHLEEN PARSONS and others
Plaintiff:
DAMMEAN R. MOSS
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5486
Defendant:
OFFICER BREEDEN, in their individual and official capacities, DOCTOR RAYMOND FABER, in their official and individual capacities, STEVEN H. WHEELER, CEO Centurion, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Andrew Randolph v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLF and ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Terrance Brown v. Andrew Beshear
as 23-6070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR ANDREW G. BESHEAR
Andrew Cox v. USA
as 23-3966
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW COX
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
