Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Jeremy Schuh v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL SCHUH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, STEPHEN H. MARSCHKE, Internal Affairs Manager of M.D.O.C. and others
Antonia Armstrong v. USA
as 16-5571
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIA ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott Syzak v. Dan Dammon, et al
as 15-2468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT SYZAK
Defendant:
DAN DAMMON, Defense Attorney, MONA ARMSTRONG, Prosecutor, CYNTHIA LANE, Judge and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BAILIFF COLLINS, BAILIFF SHERIDAN, BAILIFF MONTOYA and others
Damond Armstrong v. Jeffrey Wood
as 15-2452
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMOND ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Horace Crump v. Jim Armstrong, et al
as 14-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACE W. CRUMP, aka Horace W. Crump, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM ARMSTRONG, Director's Designee/Step III Grievance Respondent, et al
Ronald Hood #235278 v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD KING HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Warden, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, RICHARD STAPLETON, Hearings Administrator and others
Lawrence Armstrong v. Kenneth Romanowski
as 14-1734
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE ARMSTRONG
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH ROMANOWSKI, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
