Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Christopher Johnson v. TN, et al
as 16-5306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MARK GWEN, Director and others
Shy Heath v. Hannah Gibson, et al
as 14-5932
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHY HEATH
Respondent - Appellee:
HANNAH GIBSON, Probation and Parole Officer and SHANNON JONES, Chair of the Kentucky Parole Board
Ralph Diaz v. State of Tennessee Board of P
as 13-5622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH DIAZ, aka Jose Tirado
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 13-5027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, MARSHALL COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT, MARSHALL COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Thomas Ridgeway v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Corre, et al
as 12-6524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RIDGEWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, MARSHALL COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT, MARSHALL COUNTY JAIL and others
Jacobs Meeks v. Mark Luttrell, et al
as 12-6389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOBS MEEKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK LUTTRELL and STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
James Smith v. State of Tennessee Board of Pr
as 12-5703
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RAY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and JIM LEACH, Officer
Barry Ritchie v. Tennessee Board of Probation a
as 12-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY W. RITCHIE
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Willie Thornton v. Tennessee Board of Probation a, et al
as 10-5364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, Chairman of the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, WILLIAM R. PARSONS, Parole Hearing Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
