Cases 1 - 10 of 13
James Blaylock v. Robert Cooper, et al
as 24-1302
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONNIE BLAYLOCK
Defendant:
ROBERT COOPER, Dr. Psychologist and ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Healthcare
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Andrew Parks v. John Christiansen
as 22-1778
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW HAKIM PARKS
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden, St. Louis Correctional Facility
Jeffrey Peterson v. Scott Strait, et al
as 15-2402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT A. STRAIT, Sheriff, EDWARD M. WILK, Undersheriff, TIMOTHY A. AHLBORN, Jail Administrator and others
Arthur Cherry v. Nick Ludwick
as 12-2501
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR B. CHERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
NICK J. LUDWICK, Warden, St. Louis Correctional Facility
Paul Davis v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 12-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, PATRICIA CARUSO, NICK LUDWICK and others
Kevin Ragland v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 12-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN RAGLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Municipality, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, MITCHELL ROSS and others
Stacy Bowers v. Dave Burnett, et al
as 11-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY BOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE J. BURNETT, Correctional Facility Administration (CFA), Special Activities Coordinator and BILLY RAY THOMPSON, Chaplain at St. Louis Correctional Facility
Darryl McGore v. Nick Ludwick, et al
as 09-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MCGORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK LUDWICK, Warden and JOHN DOE, School teacher at St. Louis Correctional facility
Michael Morgan v. Blaine Lafler
as 09-1991
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAINE LAFLER, Warden, St. Louis Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
