Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Paul Weakley v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 16-5627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL RAYMOND WEAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Lee, Unknown SIS Officer at USP-Big Sandy, Unknown Officer at Big-Sandy, and R.P screening room, UNKNOWN HOBBS, UNKNOWN BAKER, Counselors and others
Lodise Wadley v. Robert Farley
as 14-6045
Petitioner - Appellant:
LODISE WADLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT FARLEY, Warden - USP Big Sandy
Donald Ferebe v. Robert Farley
as 14-5468
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD FEREBE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT FARLEY, Warden, USP-Big Sandy
Drew Brinson v. Richard Ive
as 13-5816
Petitioner - Appellant:
DREW H. BRINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD IVES, Warden of USP-Big Sandy
Carlos Robinson v. Warden of USP - Big Sandy
as 13-5471
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS DEMOND ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF USP - BIG SANDY
James Browning, Jr. v. Staff at USP Big Sandy, et al
as 12-6215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HOLMAN BROWNING, JR.
Defendant:
STAFF AT USP BIG SANDY
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN PENNINGTON, aka L. T. Pennerton, TIM FAZENBAKER, MYRON L. BATTS and others
Marshall Williams v. J.C. Zuercher
as 10-5218
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
J.C. ZUERCHER, Warden of USP-Big Sandy
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Vernon Morgan, et al
as 09-5554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUS-SHAHID M.S. ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON MORGAN, Factory Foreman/Manager at the United States Penitentiary Big Sandy ("USP-Big Sandy"), JOHN R. GRINDSTAFF, Associate Warden of USP-Big Sandy, H.A. RIOS, JR., the former Warden of USP-Big Sandy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
