Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lowell Payne, Jr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 13-3089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, NORMAN ROBINSON, TIM POLLACK and others
Otto Berk, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 12-4180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTTO BERK, JEFF BLAIR, LESTER V. KERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, et. al.
Robert Martin v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 12-4130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, TIMOTHY BRUNSMAN, SHAY HARRIS and others
Defendant:
CASEY BARR, J. T. HALL, BRIAN BENDEL and others
Lorenzo Harrison v. William Gregg, et al
as 12-4081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM GREGG, JOHN BUCKHALTER, JOHN/JANE DOE and others
William Dixon v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 12-3963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, et al., LARRY GREEN, DON MORGAN and others
William Dixon v. Gary Mohr
as 12-3694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, et al.
Edward Smith v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 12-3241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR
OH Execution Protocol
as 12-3035
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS, et. al.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LORRAINE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
David Clark v. J. Parker, et al
as 11-4458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
J. PARKER, KLEINKNECHT, Sergeant, HILL and others
Brian Wickensimer, et al v. Keith Smith, et al
as 11-3680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN WICKENSIMER
Plaintiff:
KELI DUNNICAN, MITCHELL MOORE, ROBERT GAUGHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH SMITH, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution, JACKSON, Maintenance Person, Toledo Correctional Institution, LONG, Maintenance Person, Toledo Correctional Institution and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
