Cases 11 - 20 of 199
LaRhonda Perez v. Bryan Simpson, et al
as 23-5193
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARHONDA DUNLAP PEREZ
Defendant:
BRYAN SIMPSON, Officer
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSH PATRICK, Officer
Laura Perez Penaloza v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3195
Petitioner:
LAURA PEREZ PENALOZA and JISSEL ESMERALDA PEREZ PENALOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Orlando Perez, Jr. v. Corey Foster
as 23-3073
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLANDO PEREZ, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
COREY FOSTER, Warden
Jose Sanchez-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3004
Petitioner:
JOSE YANEL SANCHEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
USA v. Aquileo Perez-Pineda
as 22-3443
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AQUILEO PEREZ-PINEDA
Jose Perez-Garcia v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-3335
Petitioner:
JOSE SAUL PEREZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Julio Orellana-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3267
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR ORELLANA-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Christian Rosales-Rivera, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3215
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN ANTONIO ROSALES-RIVERA and JESSICA MICHELLE VILLALTA-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
