Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-5402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, INOCENTES SATOR, SANDRA HALL and others
Kevin Burns v. Ricky Bell
as 11-5214
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN B. BURNS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Gabble Mitchell v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABBLE LEE MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden, RMSI and LARHONDA HOWARD, Financial Specialist, United States District Court Clerk
Joseph Miles v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-5074
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH MILES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
Billy Irick v. Ricky Bell
as 10-6363
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY R. IRICK
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Stephen West v. Ricky Bell
as 10-6338
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL WEST
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Stephen West v. Gayle Ray, et al
as 10-6196
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL WEST
Respondent - Appellee:
GAYLE RAY, in her official capacity as Tennessee's Commissioner of Correction, RICKY BELL, Warden, in his official capacity as Warden of Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, DAVID MILLS, in his official capacity as Deputy Commission of Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Edward Harbison v. George Little, et al
as 10-6126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JEROME HARBISON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, in his official capacity as Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, ROLAND COLSON, JULIAN DAVIS and others
Ronald Cauthern v. Ricky Bell
as 10-5759
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD MICHAEL CAUTHERN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Jon Hall v. Ricky Bell
as 10-5658
Petitioner - Appellant:
JON HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
