Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Darrell Miles v. KY Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 17-5848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL L. MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, DON BOTTOM, Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miles-McClellan Construction v. Kenny/Obayashi, et al
as 17-3443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILES-MCCLELLAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNY/OBAYASHI, a Joint Venture, KENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and OBAYASHI CORPORATION
Miles-McClellan Construction v. Kenny/Obayashi, et al
as 17-3443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILES-MCCLELLAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNY/OBAYASHI, a Joint Venture, KENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and OBAYASHI CORPORATION
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Martin Miles v. George Stephenson
as 17-1322
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN MILES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
Damon McCormick v. Nurse Kendra, et al
as 17-5109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON MCCORMICK
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE KENDRA, Southern Health Partners, COL. GIBSON, Henderson County Jail, NURSE LEA, Southern Health Partners and others
Defendant:
NURSE MILES, Southern Health Partners
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
