Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Damien Sublett v. Randy White, et al
as 14-6513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WHITE, DUKE PETTIT, BRUCE VON DWINGELO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Umoh Duke v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-3925
Petitioner:
UMOH DUKE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Buckeye Power, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 13-3672
Petitioner:
BUCKEYE POWER, INC., DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Luegene Holcomb v. Shelby County, et al
as 13-5627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUEGENE HOLCOMB, aka Lue Holcomb
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, JERRY JOHNSON, CURTIS DUKES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
