Cases 31 - 40 of 547
Corey Lea, et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 23-5169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEA, SFE LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC., WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and DOROTHY WISE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, ZACH DUCHENEAUX, FSA Administrator and others
Willie CurtisIn re: Willie Curtis
as 23-1113
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIE BEASLEY CURTIS
Respondent:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Willie Curtis v. Timothy Stallman
as 23-1009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE BEASLEY CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR TIMOTHY STALLMAN
Willie Curtis v. Simon, et al
as 22-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE BEASLEY CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISON COUNSELOR SIMON, TIMOTHY S. FLANAGAN, Parole Board Member and CRISSA BLANKENBURG, Parole Board Member
In re: Leatha Taylor, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 22-6078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEATHA TAYLOR, Individually and as Administratrix of Estate of David Taylor, KATHY BARNES, LISA ARLENE PEOPLES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
USA v. Willie Sanders, Jr.
as 22-4024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIE L. SANDERS, JR.
USA v. Willis Cochran
as 22-5949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIS C. COCHRAN, aka Willie Cochran
USA v. Abrey Willis
as 22-1938
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ABREY ARMON WILLIS
Calvin Tankesly v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, et al
as 22-5818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN TANKESLY
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA CADNEY, Food Steward and WILLIE RAMSEY, Food Steward
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
