Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 157
Alvin Simmons v. NEOCC, et al
as 16-4728
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALVIN SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Warden, Medical Department, RUPLKA, COUNSELOR MS. GRANT and others
USA v. Austin Wood
as 16-6718
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: AUSTIN TANNER WOOD
USA v. Austin Wood
as 16-6717
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: AUSTIN TANNER WOOD
Marvin Belser v. Brenda James, et al
as 16-2578
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARVIN BELSER
Defendant - Appellee: BRENDA JAMES, Health Care Unit Manager, JOHN AUSTIN, D.O. (originally named as James Austin on docket in error), ANGELA ROSE, Nurse Practitioner and others
Defendant: ERICA HUSS, Deputy Warden and K. GIESEN, ARUS
USA v. Jack Ray Austin
as 16-6588
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JACK RAY AUSTIN
In re: Mtu Akili
as 16-4192
Movant: In re: MTU AKILI, aka Muntu Akili, aka Darrin Austin
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Daniel Austin, Jr.
as 16-4156
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL T. AUSTIN, JR.
Austin Carter v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 16-6516
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUSTIN CARTER
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CHERYL LINDAMOOD, Warden, KATHERINE BUTTRAM and others
Michael Gresham v. Pamela Austin, et al
as 16-2049
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee: PAMELA AUSTIN, DDS Dentist, UNKNOWN LESE, Correctional Officer, S. EAGLE, named as Unknown S. Eagle or Jane Doe Dental Assistant and others
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?