Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Calvin WareIn re: Calvin Ware
as 23-1651
Petitioner:
In re: CALVIN B. WARE
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden and BARBRA STOREY, Acting Warden
Eric Ware-Mustapha v. Dixon, et al
as 23-5605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WARE-MUSTAPHA, aka Eric Ware
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DIXON, Kitchen Supervisor 3, OFFICER CLAXTON, Kitchen Supervisor 2, DOCTOR GILL and others
Cornelius Ware v. John Davids
as 23-1356
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORNELIUS WARE
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Allen Atkins v. Russell Savoie, et al
as 23-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ATKINS, aka Allen Aikens
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER RUSSELL SAVOIE, sued in his individual capacity, WARDEN CONNIE HORTON, Warden, sued in her individual capacity, ACTING WARDEN JAMES CORRIGAN, sued in his individual capacity and others
In re: Leatha Taylor, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 22-6078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEATHA TAYLOR, Individually and as Administratrix of Estate of David Taylor, KATHY BARNES, LISA ARLENE PEOPLES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Jack Kasiotis, et al v. AWP, Inc.
as 22-3858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK KASIOTIS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, DELANO ANGLIN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and MARY WARE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AWP, INC., dba Area Wide Protective
James Stewart v. Connie Horton, et al
as 22-1767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, former Warden, [UNKNOWN] ANDERSON, 3rd Shift C/O, [UNKNOWN] CASEY, 2nd Shift C/O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
