Cases 1 - 7 of 7
David McCarty, et al v. Natl Union Fire Ins Co, et al
as 16-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID C. MCCARTY and CYNTHIA K. MCCARTY
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. PEDRAZA
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA and ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE PROFESSIONS OF DELAWARE, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
David Schied v. Karen Khalil, et al
as 15-2464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SCHIED
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN KHALIL, CATHLEEN DUNN, JOSEPH BOMMARITO and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Hantz Financial Services, Inc, et al v. American Int'l Specialty, et al
as 15-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANTZ FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED and HANTZ GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE CO., an Illinois corporation, nka Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURG, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation
Kent State University Board of, et al v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 11-3601
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES and TUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIVERSITY BRANCH DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant - Appellant:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, incorrectly sued as American International Group, Inc., YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, fka York Claims Services, Inc. and JAMES P. SWEENEY, JR.
Jamero Moses v. Prison Health Services, Inc., et al
as 11-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMERO T. MOSES
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY
In Re: American Intl Group Inc, et al
as 10-3714
Petitioner:
In re: AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and CHARTIS, INC.
National Union Fire Insurance v. VP Buildings, Inc.
as 08-4537
Appellant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO., cp American International Group, Inc.
Appellee:
VP BUILDINGS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
