Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Derek Block, et al v. James Canepa, et al
as 22-3852
Plaintiff:
DEREK BLOCK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH M. MILLER and HOUSE OF GLUNZ, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES V. CANEPA, Superintendent of Liquor Control, Ohio Division of Liquor Control, DAVE YOST, Attorney General of Ohio, THOMAS J. STICKRATH, Director, Ohio Department of Public Safety and others
Intervenor Defendant:
WHOLESALE BEER & WINE ASSOCIATION OF OHIO
N.A. Building Trades Unions v. OSHA
as 21-4152
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY, TEXANS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT and others
Heritage Foundation v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4149
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Respondent:
DOUGLAS L. PARKER, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARTIN J. WALSH
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, OHIO AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION, OHIO WHOLESALE BEER AND WINE ASSOCIATION and others
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Southern Baptist Theological, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4033
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY and ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health and MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Southern Glazer's Distributors, et al v. The Great Lakes Brewing Co., et al
as 17-3760
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHERN GLAZER'S DISTRIBUTORS OF OHIO, LLC
Third Party - Appellee:
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF AMERICA, INC. and GLAZER'S INC
Defendant - Appellant:
THE GREAT LAKES BREWING COMPANY, BOSTON BEER COMPANY, INC., BOSTON BEER CORPORATION and others
Clayton Byrd, et al v. TN Wine & Spirits Retailers
as 17-5552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLAYTON BYRD, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission, TENNESSEE FINE WINES AND SPIRITS, LLC, dba Total Wine Spirits Beer & More and AFFLUERE INVESTMENTS, INC., dba Kimbrough Fine Wine & Spirits
Defendant - Appellant:
TENNESSEE WINE AND SPIRITS RETAILERS ASSOCIATION
Southern Glazer's Dist. of OH v. The Great Lakes Brewing Co., et al
as 16-4235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHERN GLAZER'S DISTRIBUTORS OF OHIO, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
THE GREAT LAKES BREWING COMPANY
Defendant:
THE BOSTON BEER COMPANY, INC., et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles A. Sisson Living Trus, et al v. Beer House Distributors, Inc., et al
as 15-5171
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CHARLES A. SISSON LIVING TRUST, CHARLES A. SISSON and MARALEE SISSON
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
BEER HOUSE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and MARY S. KENNEY
Defendant:
JOHN DAVID WILLETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
