Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sarnaa Archie v. Cinti/NKY Intl Airport, et al
as 21-5973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARNAA ARCHIE
Defendant / Appellee:
CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CVG Airport or Police, DETECTIVE KEN COYLE and SEVERAL UNKNOWN OFFICERS
David Coyle v. University of Kentucky, et al
as 14-5401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID COYLE, individually and doing business as Team Coyle Photography
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, as successor in interest to the University of Kentucky Athletics Association, ERIC N. MONDAY, individually and in his capacity as Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration of the University of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
PAUL MILLER FORD, INC., UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HANDS ON ORIGINALS, INC. and others
Hawkins v. Coyle
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 05-4049
Petitioner - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
SHAWN L. HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RALPH COYLE, Warden
Hawkins v. Coyle
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 05-4032
Petitioner - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
SHAWN L. HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RALPH COYLE, Warden
Joseph v. Coyle
as 05-3113
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH COYLE, Warden
Joseph v. Coyle
as 05-3111
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH COYLE, Warden
Johnson v. Mitchell
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 00-3350
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY V. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RALPH COYLE, Warden and BETTY MITCHELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.