Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eric Kohler v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 21-3466
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself all others similarly situated and ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-10
Steven Rubenstein v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 20-5166
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW MARION SCOGGINS, III, General Counsel, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, Named Officials, Official Capacity Only, WAYNE DAVIS, Interim Chancellor, UTK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RUBENSTEIN
Steven Rubenstein v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 20-5024
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW MARION SCOGGINS, III, General Counsel, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, Named Officials, Official Capacity Only, WAYNE DAVIS, Interim Chancellor, UTK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RUBENSTEIN
Defendant:
SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES, "Society"
In re: George Baveli
as 14-8066
Debtor:
In re: GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Defendant - Appellant:
TED DOUKAS
Defendant:
NEMESIS OF L.I. CORP., QUICK CAPITAL OF L.I. CORP., R.P.M. RECOVERIES, INC. and others
In re: George Baveli
as 13-8015
Debtor:
In re: GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE A. BAVELIS
Defendant - Appellant:
TED DOUKAS, NEMESIS OF L.I. CORP., QUICK CAPITAL OF L.I. CORP. and others
Defendant:
JOHN M. STRAVATO, MAHAMMAD QURESHI, MAQ MANAGEMENT and others
Peter Barker-Homek v. TAQA New World, Inc., et al
as 11-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BARKER-HOMEK
Defendant - Appellee:
TAQA NEW WORLD, INC., CARL SHELDON, DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50 and others
Rickey Jones v. Kentucky Department of Correct, et al
as 11-5350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES NETWORK, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
