Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Justin Robbins v. Comm of Social Security
as 24-3201
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN T. ROBBINS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
USA v. Robin Riley, Jr.
as 23-3376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBIN DEAN RILEY, JR., aka Robbin Riley
Robbin Nelson, et al v. Heather Greene Sharp, et al
as 22-6018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIN NELSON, ROBERT A. SHARP, JR. and JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER ANNE GREENE SHARP, CATHERINE RICE HOLDERFIELD, In her individual capacity as a Judge of the Warren Circuit Court and KY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eric Tarter v. Metro Nashville Airport Auth, et al
as 22-5421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC TARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE AIRPORT AUTHORITY, OFFICER BRIAN ROBBINS, OFFICER JERRY LOVELL and others
Defendant:
MARLENE FERNANDEZ
USA v. Rodney Robbins, II
as 21-3314
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY A. ROBBINS, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dustan Hale v. Boyle County, KY, et al
as 20-6195
Defendant / Appellee:
BOYLE COUNTY, KY, THOMAS PENNINGTON and DEREK ROBBINS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTAN HALE
Hollie Annette v. William Haslam, et al
as 20-5657
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, WILLIAM EDWARD HASLAM, dba William Edward Haslam and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOLLIE ANNETTE
Karst Robbins Coal Company, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 19-3836
Petitioner:
BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION and KARST ROBBINS COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARLIN D. RICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6835
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
