Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
In re: Leatha Taylor, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
as 22-6078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEATHA TAYLOR, Individually and as Administratrix of Estate of David Taylor, KATHY BARNES, LISA ARLENE PEOPLES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Mike Settle v. Core Civic, Inc., et al
as 22-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS, T.T.C.C., BILLY HOYLE, ASHLEIGH VAN DYKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenta Settles v. Michael Malak, et al
as 21-4038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATROLMAN MICHAEL MALAK, PATROLMAN ROBERT PITTS, PATROLMAN BRIAN REGOVICH and others
Kenta Settles v. City of Garfield Heights, OH, et al
as 21-4040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH, MICHAEL MALAK, Patrolman and ROBERT PITTS, Patrolman
Kenta Settles v. Michael Malak, et al
as 21-4017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATROLMAN MICHAEL MALAK, PATROLMAN ROBERT PITTS, PATROLMAN BRIAN REGOVICH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
