Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, et al v. SEC
as 24-3220
Petitioner: OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ex rel., RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, Attorney General and others
Respondent: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Dan Hale, et al v. State of Tennessee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6253
Plaintiff: DAN E. HALE
Plaintiff / Appellant: DON HALE, Individually, and as Trustee for the HRC Medical Defined Benefit Plan
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel., HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General and Reporter and HOGDEN MAINDA
USA, ex rel Leann Marshall, et al v. Univ of TN Medical Center, et al
as 21-5895
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEANN MARSHALL and VIB PARTNERS
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MEDICAL CENTER HOME CARE SERVICES, LLC and LHC GROUP, INC.
USA, ex rel. v. Southeast Eye Specialists, et al
as 21-5332
Plaintiff: ROSS LUMPKIN, GARY ODOM and STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel.
Defendant / Appellee: SOUTHEAST EYE SPECIALISTS, PLLC, SOUTHEAST EYE SURGERY CENTER, LLC and EYE SURGERY CENTER OF CHATTANOOGA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
USA, et al v. MedQuest Associates, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6520
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. and KAREN J. HOBBS
Defendant - Appellant: MEDQUEST ASSOCIATES, INC., BIOIMAGING AT CHARLOTTE, INC., BIOIMAGING OF COOL SPRINGS, INC. and others
Bamrung Chumpia, et al v. Memphis Area Teacher Credit Un
as 09-6329
Plaintiff - Appellant: BAMRUNG P. CHUMPIA, on behalf of himself and his spouse
Plaintiff: STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant - Appellee: MEMPHIS AREA TEACHER CREDIT UNION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?