Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1032
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] CHAPMAN, Psychologist, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as John Doe 1; Mental Health Unit Chief for Chippewa, THOMAS OSIER, Mental Health Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Andre Brown v. Terry Mackay, et al
as 19-1569
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BALL, Warden, TERRY MACKAY, Lieutenant, L. SHARP, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE C. BROWN
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 19-1565
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HOLDEN, TIMOTHY P. BALL, Deputy Warden, [UNKNOWN] MUCHA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Jimmy Scott v. Thomas Mackie
as 19-1494
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Nima Nassiri v. Thomas Mackie
as 19-1025
Petitioner / Appellant:
NIMA NASSIRI
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Daniel Catt v. M. Brown, et al
as 17-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL CATT
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BROWN, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WARD, CORRECTIONS OFFICER FORWARD and others
Michael Barner v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 17-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden, LORI DUMAS, Registered Nurse, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as John/Jane Doe I, ECF Health Care Medical Administrator and others
Elliot Pilton v. Unknown Duby, et al
as 17-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLIOT PILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN DUBY and THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Michael Powell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, K. ROXANNE MCKEE, Deputy Director, THOMAS OSIER, Assistant Mental Health Director and others
Myqueal Cotton v. Thomas Mackie
as 17-1059
Petitioner - Appellant:
MYQUEAL DONTRE COTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
