Cases 101 - 110 of 5,385
Brodie v. USA
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Andre M. Brodie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Harmon et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon, Comprehensive Correctional Care and Nora Janes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Wellman et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Harold Donavan Sanders
Defendant:
Nicholas Wellman and Austin Esther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Mitchell v. Willet
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer Willet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
