Cases 71 - 80 of 5,383
Adkins v. Denny et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Carl Adkins
Defendant:
Jason Denny, Benjamin Alexander, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. 3C Medical
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brannon Lee Rowe
Defendant:
3C Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Plappert et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Henry Price, III
Defendant:
Laura Plappert, Cookie Crews, Courtney Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Muhlenberg County
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cameron White
Defendant:
Muhlenberg County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Call et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
Matt Call and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carpenter v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Defendant:
Troy Wilson, Deanna Noble, Daniel Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Daron Darnell Bell
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, Richard Boling, Eric Pacheo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
