Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,695
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv10738
Petitioner: Mario Jones
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carpenter v. USA
as 4:2024cv10764
Petitioner: Maurice Willis Carpenter
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dooley v. USA
as 2:2024cv10716
Petitioner: Donte Dooley
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv10717
Petitioner: Raymond W. Adams
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. USA
as 2:2024cv10455
Petitioner: Toriano Cornell Davis
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10630
Petitioner: Anthony James Patterson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10631
Petitioner: Anthony James Patterson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Green v. USA
as 2:2024cv10580
Petitioner: Clifford Green
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. USA
as 2:2024cv10532
Petitioner: Carnell Hughes
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hinton v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10482
Petitioner: James Hinton
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?