Cases 71 - 80 of 5,224
Lindsay v. North Central Correctional Complex et al
as 1:2023cv01649
Petitioner:
Wendell Renard Lindsay, II
Defendant:
North Central Correctional Complex, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction and Adult Parole Authority/Adult Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russaw v. Gray
as 1:2023cv01669
Petitioner:
Stanley Russaw
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregley v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv01473
Petitioner:
Duane Gregley
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDaniel v. Forshey
as 5:2023cv01698
Petitioner:
Woody A. McDaniel
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Foley
as 5:2023cv01780
Petitioner:
Jackie N. Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Luneke
as 1:2023cv01375
Petitioner:
Eugene Wade
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Robinson
as 1:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
David Fields
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chilcoat v. Government
as 3:2023cv01729
Petitioner:
Donald E. Chilcoat
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
