Cases 61 - 70 of 205
Shephard v. Brennan et al
as 1:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Diana Shephard
Defendant:
Postal Service (U.S.) and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teart v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority
as 1:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Tyra Teart
Defendant:
Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frail v. Bernard et al
as 2:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
Zachary Frail
Defendant:
Bruce Bernard , Here & There Around Campus, LLC and Ravine Ridge Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cottman v. Carespring, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cottman
Defendant:
Carespring, Inc., John Muller, Heather Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Union Savings Bank et al
as 1:2016cv01172
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Union Savings Bank and Guardian Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority
as 3:2016cv00466
Defendant:
Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority
Plaintiff:
Freedom's Path at Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ragland v. EZ Home Solutions Group, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00749
Plaintiff:
Rita Ragland
Defendant:
EZ Home Solutions Group, LLC and Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon et al v. MNM Home Rentals Group, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
Latoya Dixon , M.D., a minor and J.D., a minor
Defendant:
MNM Home Rentals Group, LLC and Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason v. Adams County Recorder et al
as 1:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Darryl O. Mason
Defendant:
Adams County Recorder , Allen County Recorder , Ashland County Recorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Farley v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Timothy Farley
Defendant:
Kim Smith and Shepherd Management, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
