Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Hyde v. McAllister et al
as 2:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Tad Jason Hyde
Defendant:
Jeff McAllister, Marshall, Detty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Aramark Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02015
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Aramark Inc, Ms. Williams, Ms. Stoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardyman v. Bethel et al
as 2:2014cv02011
Plaintiff:
Shane Hardyman
Defendant:
Lisa Bethel, Dr. Green, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks, Robert Austin, Earl Steidl and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Pickaway Correctional Institution, Gary C Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardyman v. Bethel et al
as 1:2014cv00793
Plaintiff:
Shane Hardyman
Defendant:
Lisa Bethel, Dr. Green, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Welch et al
as 2:2014cv01355
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Dr. Welch, Ms. Whaley and John/Jane Does X 25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Pickaway Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2014cv00726
Plaintiff:
Robert Austin
Defendant:
Pickaway Correctional Institution, Gary Mohr, Andrew Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spar v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Spar
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, John DesMarias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyer v. Whorton et al
as 1:2013cv00773
Plaintiff:
Anthony Loyer
Defendant:
J. Whorton, Marty Jones, George Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Ball et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bates
Defendant:
James Ball, Corby Free, John/Jane Doe(s) #1 through #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
