Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03166
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Kurt Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Alinda Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker, Jr. v. Nolan et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Donald Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney Tim Nolan, Attorney Leon Hewitt, Austin Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Roger Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Natasha Walker and Nathan Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00819
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
James Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
