Cases 61 - 70 of 10,991
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Rasheem Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Peone et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Brandon Peone, Andre Johnson, Chris Brun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. City of Nashville, The et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
City of Nashville, The, State of Tennessee, The, Buddy Rhett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00481
Petitioner:
Randall Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
