Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Taylor-Sterling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00886
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tina Taylor-Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munn v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
William Munn
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milam et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Milam and Jennifer Milam
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flair v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
Rhiannon Flair
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dirks v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Dirks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gliko v. Advanced Sterilization Products Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00855
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gliko
Defendant:
Advanced Sterilization Products Services, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kitchens v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
Theresa L. Kitchens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangrum v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Wanda Mangrum
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Limited, Ethicon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moores et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Janet Katherine Moores and Scott Moores
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Limited, Ethicon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Annette Chapman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
