Cases 21 - 30 of 32
United States of America et al v. Walgreen Company
as 3:2013cv00870
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Andrew Hirt
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00980
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., K Mart Corporation, Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercer v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2010cv00972
Plaintiff:
Michael Mercer
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lambert et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 3:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
Margaret Carolyn Lambert, Margaret Carolyn Lambert, Charlie Haskins and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Ethex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Birk et al v. K-V Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 3:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Gloria Birk, Gloria Birk, Darrell Birk and others
Defendant:
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, Ethex Corporation and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Prince v. Best Buy et al
as 3:2009mc00034
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Prince
Defendant:
Best Buy, Walgreen's, Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Walgreen Co. et al v. Caremark RX, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00744
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant:
Caremark RX, Inc., Caremark Rx, LLC, CaremarkPCS Alabama Mail Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
