Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Nance et al v. Nance et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Barry Thomas Nance and O'leisha Nance
Defendant:
Leslie Nance, Keeon Nance, Bells Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Henry et al
as 2:2021cv02157
Petitioner:
Prentiss Antonio Phillips
Respondent:
Darl Bell, Dentist Thomas Henry and Donna Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Bell et al
as 2:2019cv02526
Defendant:
Darl Bell, Nurse Joinder, Nurse Booker and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2018cv02843
Defendant:
Core Civic, Case Manager Anderson and Counselor Bell
Plaintiff:
J. W. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv02985
Plaintiff:
Earl J. Howard
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Markee Jones, Reginald Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tappan v. Haslam et al
as 1:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Alton L. Tappan
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Derrick Schofield, Michael Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv01299
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walton
Defendant:
Jobs Coordinator Jones, Business Manager Johnson, Asst. Warden of Programs Devers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Henely et al
as 1:2014cv01236
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dalton
Defendant:
Henely, Amos, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Madison County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv01007
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Montez Bryant
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, F/N/U Bell, F/N/U Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
Michele Phillips
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, T.H.P., Jackson County Jail Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
