Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tankesly v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv01058
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tankesly
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Monqie Skowronski, Pam Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Schofield et al
as 1:2015cv01135
Plaintiff:
Ray Turner
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Tony Parker, William Gupton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Pickens et al
as 1:2014cv01283
Plaintiff:
Justin R Forrest
Defendant:
Jody S. Pickens and Susan D. Korsnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv01281
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamont Anderson
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Ms. Duncan, Mr. A. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marley v. Smith et al
as 2:2012cv03026
Plaintiff:
Bob Marley
Defendant:
Angela Smith, James C. Beasley, Jr., Susan Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv02811
Plaintiff:
Jacob Randall Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dyersburg Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv02102
Petitioner:
Sheila Garrett
Respondent:
Dyersburg Police Department, Dyersburg Medical Center, Greg Lowe and others
Defendant:
John Holden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv02724
Plaintiff:
Jacob Randall Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bruton v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mell T. Bruton
Defendant:
Connie Martin, Kim Helper and Susan Logan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brillon v. Mills et al
as 2:2006cv02783
Plaintiff:
Michael Brillon
Defendant:
Marcel Mills, Cross, Richard Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
