Cases 81 - 90 of 17,797
Smith v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Joel Miller, Russ Cambarare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00692
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Dale
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Silver v. Christopher et al.
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Silver and Mr. Silver
Defendant:
Associate Warden Philip Christopher, Warden Michelle Henry, Associate Warden Damara Shemo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Franklin County Corrections Center et al
as 2:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Richardson
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections Center, Nurse Linda Doe and Nurse Sandy Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reese v. Holbrook
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Destin Dezwyn Reese
Defendant:
Judge Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutherford v. Free et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clinton Rutherford
Defendant:
Corby Free, Ashley Marsh, Lt. Jhones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Holmes v. Glaser et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela J. Glaser, Maria Christine Palermo and Michelle Agresta Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. May
as 5:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
