Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harris v. Auto Club Property-Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Harris
Defendant:
Auto Club Property-Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arch Specialty Insurance Comp v. David Cline, et al
as 13-6068
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
DAVID H. CLINE, RANDOLPH R. EVANS, JOAN EVANS and others
Arch Specialty Insurance Comp v. David Cline, et al
as 13-6009
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DAVID H. CLINE
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RANDOLPH R. EVANS, JOAN EVANS, RANDOLPH R. EVANS, M.D., P.C. and others
Arch Specialty Insurance Co v. David Cline, et al
as 13-5986
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DAVID H. CLINE
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDOLPH R. EVANS, JOAN EVANS, RANDOLPH R. EVANS, M.D., P.C. and others
Arch Specialty Insurance Co v. David Cline, et al
as 13-5987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID H. CLINE
Defendant:
RANDOLPH R. EVANS, JOAN EVANS, RANDOLPH R. EVANS, M.D., P.C. and others
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Kenneth Harris, et al
as 11-5548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KENNETH RAY HARRIS and KATHRYN L. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellant:
RODGER D. BUNKER
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Harris et al
as 3:2010cv00582
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Ray Harris, Kathryn L. Harris and Rodger D. Bunker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Cline et al
as 2:2010cv02114
Plaintiff:
Arch Specialty Insurance Company and Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
David H. Cline, Randolph R. Evans, Joan Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
