Cases 141 - 150 of 168
Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman and Beth Freeman
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc. and Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman and Beth Freeman
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc. and Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman and Beth Freeman
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc. and Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman and Beth Freeman
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc. and Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burlison et al v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02439
Plaintiff:
James I. Burlison, Rodney L. Waits and Buford O'Neal Tankersley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Norfolk Southern Corporation v. Harrison et al
as 3:2007cv00211
Petitioner:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Respondent:
John M Harrison, Celia H Harrison and Sweetwater Valley Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Burlison et al v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02151
Plaintiff:
James I. Burlison, Rodney L. Waits and Buford O'Neal Tankersley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Johnson et al v. United Community Bank et al
as 3:2006cv00303
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Saulny v. AT&T Corp et al
as 2:2006cv02374
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Armstrong et al v. Saltire Industrial, Inc. et al
as 3:2006cv00541
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
