Cases 121 - 130 of 156
Ronald Banks v. MDOC
as 08-1940
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ward v. Howes et al
as 2:2008cv13051
Petitioner:
Michael Ward
Respondent:
Carol Howes, Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
David Hudson v. Cindi Curtin, et al
as 08-1909
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HUDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CINDI CURTIN, Warden
Respondent:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, MDOC and MICHIGAN, GOVERNER OF
Antonio Hudson v. Bill Martin, et al
as 08-1705
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Respondent:
BILL MARTIN, Director, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT KAPTURE
Antonio Hudson v. Bill Martin, et al
as 08-1647
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT KAPTURE and BILL MARTIN, Director, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
Appenzeller v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2008cv11886
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jacob Appenzeller
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dunning v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2008cv11838
Petitioner:
Yul Dunning
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Antonio Hudson v. Bill Martin, et al
as 08-1471
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Respondent:
BILL MARTIN, Director, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT KAPTURE
Antonio Hudson v. Bill Martin, et al
as 08-1464
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Respondent:
BILL MARTIN, Director, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT KAPTURE
Darrell Felver v. MDOC
as 08-1427
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL GENE FELVER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
