Cases 31 - 40 of 8,841
Malvasi v. Warden David W. Gray
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2024cv02303
Petitioner:
DAVON L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, RYAN A. PFEFFERIE and KAITLYN C. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Titus v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. May
as 5:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodkinson v. Mackey
as 5:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Michael A. Hodkinson
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tassone v. D'Varga et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tassone
Defendant:
Judge Jessica G D'Varga and Judge James Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
