Cases 11 - 20 of 5,110
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sargent Noah Page, Jailer Ken Claud, Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis and Christopher Ahlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
Mark Baker and Julie Kaelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Boaz
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nicole Walker
Defendant:
Dan Boaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hartman
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nicole Walker
Defendant:
J. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Butts, Chris Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
