Cases 41 - 50 of 960
Scott v. A. Vargez et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
A. Vargez, Jordan Rodriguez, J. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Luke Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Kerr et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Neil Kerr, Elizabeth Oneal Teal, County Attorny's Office Logan County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Attorney General Office
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Durham v. Jerry Niffenegger, et al
as 23-4040
Plaintiff:
DAVID DURHAM
Defendant:
JERRY NIFFENEGGER, In his individual and official capacity as an employee of the Warren County Sheriff's Office, MARK PURDY, In his individual and official capacity as an employee of the Warren County Sheriff's Office, JAMES CHRISTIAN, In his individual and official capacity as an employee of Target and others
Scott v. Garcia
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mintchie
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Mintchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hall
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Clayton Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Shawn Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
