Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6116
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6115
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. Payne
as 2:2016mc00049
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Jamison Payne
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Garey Lindsay v. Canon Solutions America Inc.
as 16-3503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GAREY E. LINDSAY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, For and On Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent - Appellant:
CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
National Labor Relations Board v. Lakefront Lines, Inc.
as 1:2016mc00008
Defendant:
Lakefront Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Tanisha Malone
as 1:2015cv00612
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Tanisha Malone
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
National Labor Relations Board v. Tanisha Malone
as 1:2015oe00611
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Tanisha Malone
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
National Labor Relations Board v. Hunter et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Defendant:
Gail Hunter and Charles Allen
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Filing Error
as 1:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board, Region 8
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board, Region 8 v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2015mc00038
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board, Region 8
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
