Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Doe #1 (MSA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MSA) and John Doe #2 (TRB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Association of American Railroads v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French, Commissioner Daniel R Conway and others
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023oe02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe (JEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (JDR) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (JCA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JCA), John Doe #2 (BA), John Doe #3 (JRA) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duff et al v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Duff, Starlene Gilbert, Boyd Alan Kearley and others
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Koby Wilson, Zach Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
