Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Cabrera Construction
as 2:2021cv01678
Defendant:
Cabrera Construction
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Construction by Monroy, LLC
as 2:2021cv01674
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States of America
Defendant:
Construction by Monroy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Cornell
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton J Cornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Porchia
as 2:2021cv01394
Defendant:
Leonardo Porchia
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Zuniga Roof Company, LLC
as 2:2021cv01403
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States Of America
Defendant:
Zuniga Roof Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Discount Movers
as 2:2021cv01397
Defendant:
Discount Movers doing business as Kalokoh Transport
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney's Office and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Blakesley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv10295
Plaintiff:
Raymond Blakesley
Defendant:
William McMullen, DEA US Drug Enforcement Administration, Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakesley v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10299
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Renay Blakesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khan v. Harty et al
as 2:2015cv11956
Plaintiff:
Amjad Khan
Defendant:
Michael W. Harty, Danene Hartley, Kevin Shanklin and others
Dugas v. Walker et al
as 2:2010cv12275
Plaintiff:
Robert D Dugas
Defendant:
Linda Walker, United States Attorney General and United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
