Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joshua August Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Mr Donald Roy Clark and Donald Roy Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Clark v. Saul
as 5:2021cv10451
Plaintiff:
Chirece Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clark v. Social Security
as 4:2020cv13349
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Samantha N Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00728
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dakota C Clark and Dakota Carlos Clark
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Debra Lee Clark
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Social Security
as 2:2018cv13758
Plaintiff:
Frank Gordon Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Social Security
as 3:2018cv12048
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Clark v. Social Security
as 2:2017cv13408
Plaintiff:
April E Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00821
Plaintiff:
Debra Lee Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.