Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Curtis Hertel, et al v. Mtg. Elec. Regis. Sys., Inc., et al
as 13-2109
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HERTEL, Register of Deeds and Representative of Ingham County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Ingham, County of, Ingham County and NANCY HUTCHINS, Register of Deeds and Representative of Branch County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Branch, County of, Branch, County Of
Interested Party - Appellant:
DANIEL P. MARSH and WILLIAM E. MAXWELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERSCORP, INC., JEANE M. KIVI and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Charles Maxwell v. USA
as 11-6226
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES PHILLIP MAXWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxwell v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00669
Petitioner:
Charles Phillip Maxwell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609
Charles Maxwell v. USA, et al
as 09-5804
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES PHILLIP MAXWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and EARNEST G. SHULTZ, in their defacto and/or individual capacities
Charles Maxwell v. IRS, et al
as 09-5803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES PHILLIP MAXWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and EARNEST G. SHULTZ
Maxwell v. United States et al
as 3:2009cv00451
Petitioner:
Charles Phillip Maxwell
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, Internal Revenue Service and Earnest G. Shultz
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Maxwell v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Charles Phillip Maxwell
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES and Earnest G. Shultz
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
