Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 301
Gilbert GonzalezIn re: Gilbert Gonzalez
as 22-1892
Petitioner: In re: GILBERT RAMIRO GONZALEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent: ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
Andres Gonzalez-Morales v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3596
Petitioner: ANDRES GONZALEZ-MORALES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Dario Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3199
Petitioner: DARIO GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Jose Gonzalez-Barcenas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1061
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JOSE ADOLFO GONZALEZ-BARCENAS, aka Jose Adolfo Gonzalez-Barcena
USA v. Manuel Estrada-Gonzalez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3001
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MANUEL ESTRADA-GONZALEZ, aka Roberto Mendes
USA v. Isidoro Gonzalez
as 21-4160
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ISIDORO M. GONZALEZ
Gonzalez v. Altamirano
as 2:2021cv03992
Plaintiff: Brayan Garcia Gonzalez
Defendant: Jovana Shadany Heredia Altamirano
Interested Party: Minor Child of Brayan Garcia Gonzalez and Jovana Shadany Heredia Altamirano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberto Tecum-Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3346
Petitioner: ROBERTO TECUM-GONZALEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Massage Green International Franchise Corp. v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv10504
Defendant: MGS Franchises, LLC, AGR Franchises, LLC and Reinol Gonzalez
Plaintiff: Massage Green International Franchise Corp.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?