Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Flores v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
US Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rattan v. Rattan et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Arun Rattan
Defendant:
Shailja Rattan, Bill Swan, Elected Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2014cv02946
Petitioner:
Pamela J. Moses
Respondent:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014mc00917
Petitioner:
Kenneth Peterson
Respondent:
Bill Haslam and The Tenn. Attorney General
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Other Statutory Actions
Martin v. Sheps and Associates, PLLC Attorneys at Law et al
as 3:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Coreen Martin
Defendant:
Sheps and Associates, PLLC Attorneys at Law and Checkredi of Kentucky, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patton v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2012mc00065
Petitioner:
Anthony Patton
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Alston-Jones v. Pridgen et al
as 1:2012mc00025
Plaintiff:
Anna-Maria Alston-Jones
Defendant:
John C. Pridgen, Robert Chasteen, T. Christopher Hughes and others
Lynch v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00028
Plaintiff:
William J. Lynch
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Probation & Parole, Tennessee Board of and District Attorney General's Office
In re: Service of Process on United States Attorney per Fed.R.Civ.P.4(i)(1)(A)
as 3:2012mc00003
In_re:
Service of Process on United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
