Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Juan Lopez Chavez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3964
Petitioner: JUAN GABRIEL LOPEZ CHAVEZ and ARISELDA CRISTAL LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner: In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent: BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Juan Lopez Chavez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3562
Petitioner: JUAN GABRIEL LOPEZ CHAVEZ and ARISELDA CRISTAL LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Miller v. VanNess et al
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff: Angel Miller
Defendant: Steven VanNess, United Debt Settlement, LLC, Everythign Is In Stock, LLC doing business as Elite Restaurant Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv10901
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clervrain et al v. Peters et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv10743
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir, Biglauwick Plaisimond and others
Defendant: Gary Peters, Debbie Stabenow, Andy Levin and others
Veliz
as 2:2022mc50568
Juan Lopez Chavez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3162
Petitioner: JUAN GABRIEL LOPEZ CHAVEZ and ARISELDA CRISTAL LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Sayda Mendez-Gabriel, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-4124
Petitioner: SAYDA LETICIA MENDEZ-GABRIEL and JANI IBERLA DIAZ-MENDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?