Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Abraham Contreras-Sanchez v. William Barr
as 20-4295
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM CONTRERAS-SANCHEZ
Donnell Williams v. Heather Woodin, et al
as 20-1897
Defendant / Appellee:
POLICE CAPTAIN STEVENSON, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Unknown Female Librarian, D. DINE, Mailroom Supervisor, Administrative Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNELL DEFRANCE WILLIAMS
Pedro Lopez-Sanchez v. William Barr
as 20-3934
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
PEDRO LOPEZ-SANCHEZ
Evelio Sanchez-Gonzalez v. William Barr
as 20-3938
Petitioner:
EVELIO SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Subramanya v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2020cv03707
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli and Ernest Destefano
Plaintiff:
Ranjitha Subramanya, Kebin Palma Sanchez, Lucrecia Rosa Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sandra Aguilar-Sanchez, et al v. William Barr
as 20-3689
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
EMILY YAZMIN YOC-AGUILAR and SANDRA MARIBEL AGUILAR-SANCHEZ
Sanchez et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Chad Wolfe, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Mark Hansen and others
Petitioner:
Alba Moran and Ana Vilma Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Aurelio Sanchez v. Shawn Phillips
as 20-5205
Respondent / Appellee:
SHAWN PHILLIPS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
AURELIO GARCIA SANCHEZ
Donnell Williams v. [Unknown] Stevenson, et al
as 20-1121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNELL DEFRANCE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, [UNKNOWN] FLEISHER, P.C., [UNKNOWN] STEVENSON, P.C. and others
USA v. Andrew Sanchez
as 20-5136
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW HILMAR SANCHEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
